Language, Literature and Culture  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Language and Science Competences of Nigerian and South African High School Learners in Test on Processing Variant Terminology
Language, Literature and Culture
Vol.3 , No. 1, Publication Date: Feb. 4, 2020, Page: 1-7
979 Views Since February 3, 2020, 215 Downloads Since Feb. 3, 2020
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Richard Awoshiri Kamai, English Department, Federal College of Education, Yola, Nigeria.

[2]    

Jude Valentine Badaki, English Department, Concordia College, Yola, Nigeria.

[3]    

Pierre Williams, Western Cape Education Department, Cape Town, South Africa.

 
Abstract
 

It has been widely reported that high school learners in Sub-Saharan Africa perform poorly in science subjects in public examinations. From the stand-point of linguistics, research has shown that, complexity arising from dense and varied terminology load and textual flaws in school textbooks impede the optimal processing of scientific texts by learners. There is also the issue of poor understanding of the linguistic features of the language of science. However, the use of variant terminology which may obfuscate the meaning of words in science textbooks has not been adequately studied. This study, therefore, examined term variation in the context of learners’ engagement with written science in order to determine the relationship between achievement in tasks on identifying and resolving term variation and learners’ language and science competences. Data for the study was derived from the aggregate scores of learners in an achievement test administered to Nigerian and South African high school learners. Results of the analysis indicated that language proficiency of learners was not a correlate of achievement with a coefficient of (p-= -0.7603) but that a weak positive correlation exist between the science competence of learners and achievement in tasks on processing variant terminology with a correlation coefficient of (p value = 0.2056). The study therefore concluded that, language proficiency is not a correlate of achievement in test on processing variant terminology but that achievement of learners in the test administered can be predicted by learners’ competence in science. To this effect, the study recommends the broadening of the scope of language proficiency to include a range of meta-linguistic skills, e.g. Thematic Pattern Analysis; Transitivity and Clause Relational Analysis and knowledge of scientific texts as self-organizing systems.


Keywords
 

Processing Variant Terminology, Language Proficiency, Science Competence, Nigerian and South African Learners


Reference
 
[01]    

Aina, J K & Olanipekun, S S 2013. Effects on English language on academic performance in physics and computer science among college of education students. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4 (2): 114-117.

[02]    

Antia, B & Kamai, R 2016. Writing biology, assessing biology. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication, 22 (2), 201-222.

[03]    

Awofala, A A Awofala A O Nneji L M Fatade A O 2012. The Relation between Language and Science, Technology and Mathematics in Nigerian Schools. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 3 (3): 118-124.

[04]    

Bowker, L & Hawkins, S 2006. Variation in the organization of medical terms: Exploring some motivations for term choice. Terminology, 12 (1): 79-110.

[05]    

Cekiso, M T B & Masha, R 2015. English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among primary English first additional language learners in South Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 9 (3): 325-333.

[06]    

Cleghorn, A & Rollnick, M 2002. The role of English in individual and societal development: A view from African classrooms. Tesol Quarterly, 347-372.

[07]    

Corson, D (1997). The learning and use of academic English words. Language learning, 47 (4): 671-718.

[08]    

Cummins, J 2008. BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. Encyclopedia of language and education, 487-499. United States: Springer.

[09]    

de Beaugrande, R 1997. New foundations for a science of text and discourse: cognition, communication, and the freedom of access to knowledge and society. United States of America: Greenwood Publishing Group.

[10]    

Eggins, S 2004. Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum Inte national Publishing Group.

[11]    

Fakeye, D O & Ogunsiji, Y 2009. English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among EFL students in Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 37 (3): 490-495.

[12]    

Fang, Z 2006. The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (5): 491-520.

[13]    

Gerzymisch-Arbogast, H 2008. Fundamentals of LSP translation. In MUTRA 2, 7-64.

[14]    

Groves, F H 1995. Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95 (5): 231-235.

[15]    

Halliday, M A K & Martin J R 2003. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge.

[16]    

Halliday, M A & Matthiessen C M I 2004. Matthiessen. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.

[17]    

Kauertz, A & Fischer H E 2006. Assessing students’ level of knowledge and analysing the reasons for learning difficulties in physics by Rasch analysis. In X Liu & J Boone (ed). Applications of Rasch measurement in science education. Ontario: JAM Press.

[18]    

Kauertz, A Neumann K & Haertig H 2012. Competence in science education. In K Tobin B J Fraser, & C J McRobbie (eds). Second international handbook of science education. Netherlands: Springer.

[19]    

Lemke, J L 1990. Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

[20]    

Lijnse, P L 1990. Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles: A Central Problem in Secondary Science Education. Utrecht: CDB Press.

[21]    

Maier, H & Schweiger, F 1999. Mathematics and language: Understanding and use of technical language in mathematics class. Vienna, Austria: ÖBV & HPT.

[22]    

Mji, A & Makgato, M 2006. Factors associated with high school learners' poor performance: a spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African journal of education, 26 (2): 253- 266.

[23]    

Nomlomo, V S 2007. Science teaching and learning through the medium of English and IsiXhosa: A comparative study in two primary schools in the Western Cape. Ph.D Dissertation. Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.

[24]    

Peng, S S & Wright, D 1994. Explanation of academic achievement of Asian American students. The Journal of Educational Research, 87 (6): 346-352.

[25]    

Planas, N & Setati, M 2009. Bilingual students using their languages in the learning of mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21 (3): 36-59.

[26]    

Probyn, M 2006. Language and learning science in South Africa. Language and education, 20 (5): 391-414.

[27]    

Ravelli, L 2000. Getting started with functional analysis of texts. Researching language in schools and communities. Functional linguistic perspectives. Cornwall: T J Internartional Publishers.

[28]    

Resnick, L B & Ford, W W 1981. The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

[29]    

Winterton, J Delamare-Le Deist, F & Stringfellow, E 2005. Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype. Thessaloniki, Greece: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP).

[30]    

Reddy, V 2006. Mathematics and science achievement at South African schools in TIMSS 2003. South Africa: HSRC Press.

[31]    

Rogers, M 2007. Lexical chains in technical translations: A case study in indeterminacy. In B E Antia (ed). Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in honour of Heribert Picht. Frankfurt am main: Peterlang.

[32]    

Rollnick, M 2000. Current issues and perspectives on second language learning of science. Studies in science education. 35: 93-122.

[33]    

Schmitz, K 2007. Indeterminacy of terms and icons in software localization. Indeterminacy in LSP and Terminology. Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 49-58.

[34]    

Southern African Consortium for Monitoring Education Quality 2011. Paris: SACMEQ. Available at http://www.sacmeq.org/download/Working Papers/08_. Accessed 04 June, 2017.

[35]    

Snow, C E 2010. Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. science, 328 (5977), 450-452.

[36]    

Sun, Y 1998. The academic success of East-Asian–American students-An investment model. Social Science Research, 27 (4): 432-456.

[37]    

Schleppegrell, M J 2004. The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. London: Routledge.

[38]    

Spaull, N 2015. Schooling in South Africa: How low-quality education becomes a poverty rap. South African Child Gauge 2015, 34-41.

[39]    

Ssebbunga-Masembe C & Thompson G 2008. Potential Sources of Comprehension Difficulties in Advanced Secondary School Science Textbooks: The Case of Uganda. In N Nørgaard (ed). Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication.

[40]    

Tobin, K & McRobbie, C J 1996. Significance of limited English proficiency and cultural capital to the performance in science of Chinese‐Australians. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (3): 265-282.

[41]    

Torres, H N & Zeidler, D L 2002. The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6 (3). Available at http://ejse.southwestern.edu/index. Accessed on 30 May 2017.

[42]    

West Africa Examination Council 2012-2014 May/June Chief Examiners’ Report: Lagos: WAEC.

[43]    

Yager, R E 1983. The importance of terminology in teaching K‐12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20 (6): 577-588. Textbook sources

[44]    

Umeh, I 2010. College Biology. Ibadan: IUP Ltd.

[45]    

Bezuidenhout, A Clark, S Copley, C Drew, R Engelbrecht, R & J. Goliath 2011. Oxford Successful Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership