Language, Literature and Culture  
Manuscript Information
 
 
An Academic Trend on Undergraduate Research in Higher Education Based on Bibliometric and Co-word Analysis
Language, Literature and Culture
Vol.1 , No. 1, Publication Date: May 16, 2018, Page: 17-22
576 Views Since May 16, 2018, 275 Downloads Since May 16, 2018
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Peng-bin Gao, School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, China.

[2]    

Xue Li, School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, China.

[3]    

Yi-duo Song, School of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, China.

 
Abstract
 

Based on the database of ISI Web of knowledge, this study utilized the bibliometric and co-word method to depict literature characteristics of undergraduate research, including distribution of year and journals, publication countries, subject area, and research themes. Results show that the undergraduate research experiences an overall trend of rapid development with an imbalance in the number and impact of regional documents. The importance, curriculum design and experience research denote the current direction, and the upper-division undergraduates and inquiry-based/discovery learning will become the central issues in the future.


Keywords
 

Undergraduate Research, Bibliometric Analysis, Co-word Analysis, Research Theme


Reference
 
[01]    

Imafuku R, Saiki T, Kawakami C, et al. How do students' perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? [J]. International journal of medical education, 2015, 6: 47.

[02]    

Stößlein M, Kanet J J. Developing Undergraduate Student Research Experiences in Operations Management [J]. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2008, 6 (2): 495–502.

[03]    

Healey. Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy [J]. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 2010, 47 (2): 247-248.

[04]    

Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning?[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2012, 37 (1): 85-101.

[05]    

Linn M C, Palmer E, Baranger A, et al. Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities [J]. Science, 2015, 347 (6222): 1261757.

[06]    

Lopatto D. Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. [J]. Cell Biol Educ, 2004, 3 (4): 270-277.

[07]    

Lewis S E, Lewis J E. Departing from Lectures: An Evaluation of a Peer-Led Guided Inquiry Alternative [J]. Journal of Chemical Education, 2005, 82 (1): 135-139.

[08]    

Russell S H, Hancock M P, Mccullough J. The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. [J]. Science, 2007, 316 (5824): 548-9.

[09]    

Bauer, Karen W, Bennett, et al. Alumni Perceptions Used To Assess Undergraduate Research Experience. [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2003, 74 (2): 210-230.

[10]    

Webber K L, Laird T F N, BrckaLorenz A M. Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2013, 54 (2): 227-249.

[11]    

Eagan M K, Sharkness J, Hurtado S, et al. Engaging undergraduates in science research: not just about faculty willingness [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2011, 52 (2): 151-177.

[12]    

Van Eck N J, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping [J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84 (2): 523-538.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership