ISSN Print: 2472-9450  ISSN Online: 2472-9469
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Interpol Crime Statistics and Rushton's Racial Dogma
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science
Vol.5 , No. 2, Publication Date: Apr. 16, 2019, Page: 53-57
848 Views Since April 16, 2019, 458 Downloads Since Apr. 16, 2019
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Zack Zdenek Cernovsky, Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

[2]    

Larry Craig Litman, Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

 
Abstract
 

Background and Objective: In 1990, J. P. Rushton published his analyses of crime data from Interpol handbooks for 1983-84 and 1985-86, but without explanation, included only the years 1984 and 1986. He reported that countries with predominantly Negroid population had significantly higher crime rates than predominantly Caucasoid or Mongoloid countries. The present article examines if Rushton selected only confirmatory data. Materials and Method: We re-calculated ANOVA on crime rates (rates of homicide, serious assault, sex offenses, rape, theft, robbery and violent theft) from these same Interpol yearbooks while including all 4 years (1983 to 1986). Results: We found significant differences between Caucasoids and Negroids on all variables except for serious assault, but all of these significant trends except for homicide were in the direction opposite to the one claimed by Rushton: the Caucasoids had higher crime rates. Thus, point biserial correlation coefficients indicated that reported crime rates for Negroids were significantly lower than those of Caucasoids with respect to sex offenses with rape included (-.77, p<.001), rape data calculated separately (-.63, p<.001), theft (-.69, p<.001), and robbery and violent theft (-.38, p=.006). Only the reported homicide rates were slightly higher for blacks (.43, p. 001), in those 4 years. Discussion: Our reason for re-analysing the data for all 4 years was only to examine if a selection bias was present: we ourselves do not accept such official crime data without great scepticism. Rushton’s arbitrary exclusion of data that are strongly non-supportive of his racial theory is indeed suspect and seems consistent with his prior fraudulent attempt to disguise a reference to Penthouse as a reference to a truly scientific article.


Keywords
 

Racial Differences, Crime Rates, Assaults, Homicide


Reference
 
[01]    

Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., Davis, B. A. (2019). Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research. Annual Review of Public Health. Jan 2. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043750. Epub ahead of print.

[02]    

Rushton, J. P. (1988). Race differences in behavior: a review and evolutionary analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1009-1024.

[03]    

Flynn, J. R. (2019). Reservations about Rushton. PSYCH, 1 (1), 35-43. doi: 10.3390/Psychology1010003.

[04]    

Nesselroade, J. R., Stigler, S. M., Baltes, P. B. (1980). Regression toward the mean and the study of change. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3), 622-637. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.622.

[05]    

Jackson, D. N. & Rushton, J. P. (2006). Males have greater g: Sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test. Intelligence, 34 (5), 479-486.

[06]    

Weizmann, F., Wiener, N. I., Wiesenthal, D. L., and Ziegler, M. (1991). Eggs, eggplants, and eggheads: a rejoinder to Rushton. Canadian Psychology, 32, 43-50.

[07]    

Vidmar, N. (1990). Letter to the editor. Western News (Newsletter of the University of Western Ontario), February 22, 1990.

[08]    

Rushton, J. P. & Bogaert, A. F. (1987). Race Differences in Sexual Behavior: Testing an Evolutionary Hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 529-551.

[09]    

Cernovsky, Z. Z. & Litman, L. C. (1993). Re-analyses of J. P. Rushton's crime data. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 31-36.

[10]    

Rushton, J. P. (1990). Race and crime: a reply to Roberts and Gabor. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 315-334.

[11]    

International Criminal Police Organization - Interpol. (undated publication). International crime statistics 1983-1984. Saint-Claud, France: Interpol.

[12]    

International Criminal Police Organization - Interpol. (undated publication). International crime statistics 1985-1986. Saint-Claud, France: Interpol.

[13]    

Weizmann, F., Wiener, N. I., Wiesenthal, D. L., and Ziegler, M. (1990). Differential K theory and racial hierarchies. Canadian Psychology, 31, 1-13.

[14]    

Zuckerman, M. (1990). Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences. American Psychologist, 45, 297- 1303.

[15]    

Zuckerman, M. & Brody, N. (1988). Oysters, rabbits, and people: a critique of "race differences in behavior" by J. P. Rushton. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1025-1033.

[16]    

Flynn, J. R. (1989). Rushton, evolution, and race: an essay on intelligence and virtue. The Psychologist: Bulletin of The British Psychological Society, 9, 363-366.

[17]    

Flynn, J. R. (1990). Explanation, evaluation, and a rejoinder to Rushton. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 5, 199-200.

[18]    

Cernovsky, Z. Z. (1990). Race and brain weight: a note on J. P. Rushton's conclusions. Psychological Reports, 66, 337-338.

[19]    

Cernovsky, Z. Z. (1991). Intelligence and Race: Further Comments on J. P. Rushton's Work. Psychological Reports, 68, 481-482.

[20]    

Cernovsky, Z. Z. (1992). J. P. Rushton on Negroids and Caucasoids: statistical concepts and disconfirmatory evidence. The International Journal of Dynamic Instruction and Assessment, 2, 55-67.

[21]    

Cernovsky, Z. Z. (1993). J. P. Rushton's aggregational errors in racial psychology. Journal of Black Psychology, 19, 282-289.

[22]    

Beals, K. L., Smith, C. L., Dodd, S. M. (1984). Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Current Anthropology, 25, 301-330.

[23]    

Cain, D. P., & Vanderwolf, C. H. (1990). A Critique of Rushton on Race, Brain Size, and Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 777-784.

[24]    

Gorey, K. M., & Cryns, A. G. (1995). Lack of Racial Differences in Behavior: A Quantitative Replication of Rushton's (1988) Review and an Independent Meta-Analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 345-353.

[25]    

Fancher, R. E. (1985). The Intelligence Men – Makers of the IQ Controversy. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

[26]    

Jensen, A. R. (1974) Kinship correlations reported by Sir Cyril Burt. Behavior Genetics, 4, 1-28 (see page 24).





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership