ISSN Print: 2472-9450  ISSN Online: 2472-9469
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Game Analysis of United Airlines Policy Changed Strategy on Emotional Support Animal Aboard Airplane: An Overview of Nash Equilibrium Point
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science
Vol.4 , No. 3, Publication Date: Jun. 20, 2018, Page: 75-82
953 Views Since June 20, 2018, 482 Downloads Since Jun. 20, 2018
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

James Onuche Ayegba, Department of Management Sciences and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

[2]    

Zhou Lu Lin, Department of Management Sciences and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

[3]    

Emmanuel Onu Ayegba, Department of Strategy and Planning, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Abuja, Nigeria.

 
Abstract
 

This study aims at giving answers to the questions asked; can unified acceptance list of emotional support animals with specific animals− approve by all diverse intending passengers with dire special needs for emotional support animals be sort for prior to boarding a commercial flight? Can filing application prior to boarding by people with emotional deficiency in company with their animals be enough for assessment and approval as well? A one-style-fit- all approach that can give the maximum desire becomes probabilistic, to further illustrate this just recently, United airlines witnessed a disturbing incidence, when a female passenger wanted to board a flight with her huge live peacock bird claiming to be her preferred emotional support animal. This paper conceptualised and constructed a games theory models of duo actor’s situation(s) in which each player choice of actions(s) can boomerang into different results while maintaining mutual benefits of competitiveness and cooperation. In this paper we will argue that for United or any other company in the equal situation the best strategic choice would be to respect and follow the laws and restrictions set by the aviation airlines in which the company chooses to operate. Finally, an analysis is completed through determining the optimal strategy for Passenger and United airlines and finding the equilibrium point. This work provides a new perspective for knowledge engineering.


Keywords
 

Game Theory, Emotional Animal, Knowledge Engineering, Policy Changed


Reference
 
[01]    

Defense mechanisms. (n. d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved June 18, 2014, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/defense mechanisms

[02]    

Demirel, Y. & Seçkin, Z. (2009). Örgüt içi politika davranışlarının tespiti üzerine kırgızistanda sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. OAKA. 4 (7), 143161.

[03]    

Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of management, 18 (1), 93-116.

[04]    

Forehead, G. A.,& Gilmer, B.(1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior, Psychological Bulletin, 62, 361-382.

[05]    

Gül, H., & Gökçe, H. (2008). Örgütsel etik ve bileşenleri. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 13 (1): 377-389.

[06]    

Friedman, Milton. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profit. The New York Times Magazine, 1970.

[07]    

Ott, Clauss. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Profit- and in Non-Profit-Organizations. Journal für Rechtspolitik, 2009 (17): 255–262.

[08]    

Kolstad, Ivar. Why Firms Should Not Always Maximize Profits. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007 (76): 137–145.

[09]    

Yang, Guobin. The Internet as Cultural Form: Technology and the Human Condition in China. Knowledge Technology and Policy, 2009, (22): 109–115.

[10]    

McLaughlin, Andrew ‘‘Google in China’’, Google Blog. available at: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/google- in- china.html, 2016.

[11]    

Hamilton Brooke, Knouse B. Stephen, Hill Vanessa. China: A Manager-Friendly Heuristic Model for Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, (86): 143–157.

[12]    

Wickre, Karen, Google Blog team. Testimony: The Internet in China. Google Blog, availableat: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/02/testimony-internet-in-china.html, 2006.

[13]    

MacKinnon, Rebecca. Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China. Public Choice, 4): 31–46.

[14]    

Weckert, John. What is so bad about internet content regulation? Ethics and Information Technology Luwer Academic Publishers, 2000: 105-111.

[15]    

Yang, J., ‘‘Google defends censorship of web sites’’, ABCNews, available athttp://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Business/story? id=1540568, 2006.

[16]    

Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) 2011: 5-75.

[17]    

[17] Drummond, David. New approach to China. Google Blog, available at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-tochina, 2010.

[18]    

Drummond, David. ANewapproachtoChina-Update. GoogleBlog, availableat http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/newapproach-to-china-update.html, 2010.

[19]    

Osborne, Rubinstein: A course in game theory, MIT Press 1994..

[20]    

Wong, Fang, Tjosvold. Developing business trust in government through resource exchange in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2010: DOI 10.1007/s10490-010-9241-5.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership