ISSN Print: 2381-1196  ISSN Online: 2381-120X
International Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Performance and Competitiveness of the Moroccan Tomato
International Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Vol.5 , No. 1, Publication Date: Apr. 25, 2019, Page: 1-6
931 Views Since April 25, 2019, 467 Downloads Since Apr. 25, 2019
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Fouad Elame, National Institute of Agronomic Research, Agadir Regional Center, Agadir, Morocco.

[2]    

Hayat Lionboui, National Institute of Agronomic Research, Tadla Regional Center, Beni Mellal, Morocco.

 
Abstract
 

The agricultural sector accounts for almost 16% of the country's GDP and plays a fundamental role in employment, particularly, in rural areas. Despite rainfall variability, the agricultural sector achieves performance in certain value chain, including tomato. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the government's intervention policies for greenhouse tomato production based on data collected from a sample of farmers in the Souss-Massa area. The choice of this area was made for several reasons, including the potential of tomato crop production, the share of the greenhouse tomato production in relation to domestic production and the existence of the different segments and operators involved in the fresh tomato industry. For this study, we used the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) method to assess the profitability of tomato exports; surveys were conducted among producers, processors, and exporters. The Financial and Economic Benefit ratios, nominal and effective protection coefficients and comparative advantage ratio were used in this study. Data analysis showed that tomato production at the farm level is profitable. It has a comparative advantage and can generate foreign currency. This is due to the lower social costs of tradable inputs and to the fact that actors use many domestic resources in their production systems. Thus, with a Domestic Resources Cost ratio (DRC) below one, the activity is competitive and will be more competitive in case of social costs decrease of domestic resources.


Keywords
 

Value Chain, Tomato, Policy Analysis Matrix, Comparative Advantage


Reference
 
[01]    

MAPMDREF (2017). Irrigation in Morocco. Ministry of Agriculture, Maritime Fisheries, Rural Development and Forests.

[02]    

Ministry of Agriculture and Maritime Fisheries (MAPM). (2015). Directorate of Strategy and Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.agriculture.gov.ma/

[03]    

Producers and Exporters of Fruit and Vegetables Association (APEFEL). (2013). Balance of exports - 2012-2013 season. Retrieved from http://www.apefel.com/

[04]    

Food Exports Control and Coordination Organization (EACCE). (2015). Moroccan exports in agricultural products report.

[05]    

Codron, J. M., Adanacioğlu, H., Aubert, M., Bouhsina, Z., Ait El Mekki, A., Rousset, S., Tozanli, S., Yercan, M. (2014). The role of market forces and food safety institutions in the adoption of sustainable farming practices: The case of the fresh tomato export sector in Morocco and Turkey, Food Policy, Volume 49, Part 1. 268-280. ISSN 0306-9192.

[06]    

Chemnitz, C., Grethe, H. (2005). E. U. trade preferences for Moroccan tomato exports –Who benefits? The 99th seminar of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), The future of rural Europe in the global Agri-food system, (pp. 23-27). Copenhagen.

[07]    

Madhuri, K., Sailaja, V., Sathya Gopal, P. V. and Subramanyam, D. (2017). SWOC Analysis and Strategies for Promotion of Tomato Cultivation in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Special Issue-6, pp. 1552-1557.

[08]    

Food and agriculture organization (FAO). (2004). Assistance for capacity building through enhancing operation of the national agricultural policy center. FAO Projects GCP/SYR/006/ITA and TCP/SYR/29006 (A), Comparative advantages of selected Syrian agro-food commodity chains: implications for policy formulation Technical Note.

[09]    

Tsakok, I. (1990). Agricultural price policy. Cornell University press. Ithaca, New York.

[10]    

Monke, E. A., & Pearson, S. R. (1989). The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York.

[11]    

Fredirik, L. (2005). The study of comparative advantages; Lessons learned from the study and implementation of the recommendations. Cah CIRAD, France, pp. 12-37.

[12]    

Bockel, L., Tallec, F. (2005). Commodity chain analysis using shadow prices; agricultural policy support service, policy assistance division, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-am347e.pdf

[13]    

Benziouche, S. E. (2010). The analysis of the impact of agricultural policies on the production of dates in Algeria by the Policy Analysis Matrix (MAP). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 44.

[14]    

Ismail, A., Abu Hassan, M., Zuliana, Z. A. Golnaz, R. Juwaidah, S., & Zainalabidin, M. (2015). The assessment of comparative advantage of the non-ruminant subsector through policy analysis matrix (PAM) in Peninsular Malaysia; Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 23 (S): 63 – 76.

[15]    

Elame, F., & Doukkali, M. R. (2012) Water valuation in agriculture in the Souss-Massa basin (Morocco). Integrated water resources management in the Mediterranean region, pp. 109-122.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership