






Vol.4 , No. 5, Publication Date: Aug. 23, 2017, Page: 41-44
[1] | Dheeraj Jain, Department of Pharmacognosy, Shri NMT Gujrati College of Pharmacy, Indore Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India. |
[2] | Sachin Kumar Jain, Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, IPS Academy, Indore, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India. |
[3] | Praveen Sharma, Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, IPS Academy, Indore, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India. |
[4] | Priya Jain, Department of Pharmacy, Oriental University, Indore, India. |
[5] | Nitesh Jain, Department of Pharmacy, Oriental University, Indore, India. |
Daemia extensa is a well-known traditional plant in India. The plant is having laxative, anthelmintic, astringent, Immunosuppressive, potent antioxidant, in-vitro antibacterial and antifungal activity. The aim was to search for anti-ulcer activity of ethanolic extract of Daemia extensa seed. Ethanolic extract of Daemia extensa seed was considered for its potential to protect gastric mucosa against ulcers induced by pylorus ligation and indomethacin induced methods. Ulcer index, free acidity, total acidity and percentage protection were used for evaluation of anti-ulcer activity. Pre-treatment with Daemia extensa seed extracts in dose of 400 mg/kg in both the models significantly diminished the ulcer index and the percentage protection of ulcer compared with control group (p<0.05). Based on the studies we concluded that the ethanolic extracts of Daemia extensa seeds might contain some active principles against ulcer healing properties.
Keywords
Antiulcer Activity, Daemia extensa, Ulcer Index, Percentage Protection, Omeprazol, Pylorus Ligation
Reference
[01] | S. F. D. Andrade, M. Lemos, E. Comunello, V. F. Noldin, V. C. Filho, R. Niero. Journal of ethnopharmacol. 113: 252-257, 2007. |
[02] | N. Begum, C. Mayuren, N. Balaji, R. Y. Chinnapa, K. Aravind. Adv. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 9(3): 33-36, 2008. |
[03] | P. Malairajan, G. Gopala Krishnan, S. Narasimhan, K. Jessika-laveni. Indian J Pharmacol. 40(3):126-128, 2008. |
[04] | W. A. Boyd. Text Book of Pathology Structure and Function in Disease. (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Lea & Febiger, 1970. |
[05] | T. K. Chatterjee. Herbal options. Calcutta: Books and Allied Private Limited, 2000. |
[06] | E. O. Jude, A. Paul. J. Pharm. Sci. 22: 384-390, 2009. |
[07] | N. C. Dey, T. K. Dey A Text Book of Pathology. (5th ed.). Culcutta: New Central Book Agency, 2002. |
[08] | V. Kanta, S. L. Bodhankar, Y. V. Machave, P. A. Thakurdesai. Adv Pharmacol Toxicol. 7(1): 83-87, 2006. |
[09] | K. R. Khandelwal. Practical Pharmacognosy. Techniques and experiments. 2nd ed. Pune: Nirali Prakashan, 149-56, 2000. |
[10] | S. Edwin, J, Edwin, L. Deb, S. Goyal, S. Gupta. 44(5): 395-397, 2007. |
[11] | A. Mohammed, J. Ravikumar, H. Y. Santosh, M. N. Nagashruthi. Indian Drugs 45(12): 979-981, 2008. |
[12] | P. B. Hawk, B. L. Oser, H. W. Summerson. Practical physiological chemistry. (12th ed.). London: Churchill; 1947. |
[13] | C. K. Kokate, A. P. Purohit, S. B. Gokhale. Pharmacognosy. (20th ed.). Pune: Nirali Prakashan, 2009. |
[14] | J. P. Mohanty, L. K. Nath, N. R. Bhuyan, U. K. Nayak. Int J Pharmaco. Biol Sci 2(1): 159-164, 2008. |
[15] | J. E. Okokon, P. A. Nwafor. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 22: 384-90, 2009. |
[16] | P. H. Patil S. J. Surana Int J Pharmacol Biol Sci 3(1): 81-93, 2009. |
[17] | D. Raju, K. Ilango, V. Chitra, K. Ashish. Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1: 101-7, 2009. |
[18] | R. K. Srinivas, K. Srisailam, V. M. Reddy, Int J Pharmacol Biol Sci. 3(1): 51-54, 2009. |