ISSN: 2375-3854
International Journal of Ecological Science and Environmental Engineering  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Comparative Studies on the Pedological Characteristics, Morphological Traits and Productivity Indices of Three Species of the Genus Ipomoea in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
International Journal of Ecological Science and Environmental Engineering
Vol.4 , No. 3, Publication Date: Aug. 31, 2017, Page: 29-34
248 Views Since August 31, 2017, 158 Downloads Since Aug. 31, 2017
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Ogbemudia Felix Okpako, Department of Botany and Ecological Studies, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

[2]    

Ita Richard Ekeng, Department of Botany and Ecological Studies, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

[3]    

Akpan Ekomobong Etinam, Department of Botany and Ecological Studies, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

 
Abstract
 

Comparative studies on the pedological characteristics, morphological traits and productivity indices of three species of the genus Ipomoea was done in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Morphological parameters (leaf length, leaf width and leaf area index) and productivity indices (chlorophyll a, b carotenoids and Chlorophyll Concentration Index (CCI)) of these species were determined using standard methods. The results showed that amongst the three species studied Ipomoea mauritiana had the highest values in leaf length (21.60±1.34 cm) leaf width (19.57±1.92 cm) and Leaf Area Index (LAI) (191.5±19.94 cm2) while I. muricata had the least values in terms of leaf length (7.5±0.31 cm) leaf width (7.00±0.42 cm) and LAI (24.08±3.00 cm2). Considering the productivity indices, the results further reflected a similar trend with Ipomoea mauritiana having the highest concentration of chlorophyll a (1.34±0.035), chlorophyll b (0.97±0.025), carotenoids (0.75±0.019) and CCI (53.84±1.38) while Ipomoea muricata had the least values for chlorophyll a (0.93±0.058), chlorophyll b (0.67±0.042), carotenoids (0.52±0.033) and CCI (37.30±2.34). Ipomoea batatas had intermediate values for all morphological and productivity parameters. Using leaf area index as surrogate for morphological traits, linear regression technique was employed to establish relationships with productivity indices of Ipomoea species studied. Positive relationships were established between the productivity indices and the morphological characters and this underscored the influences of chlorophyll pigments on the growth morphology of the leaves. The results obtained in this study provide a baseline information on the habitat (soil) and environmental preferences of these species as well as their evolutionary variations and can be useful in delineating the modern trends in habitat ecology and plant physiology.


Keywords
 

Comparative Studies, Pedological Characteristics, Morphological Traits, Productivity Indices, Ipomoea Species, Regression


Reference
 
[01]    

Anjum, S. A., Xie, X Wang, L. Saleem, M. F Man, C. and Lei, W. (2011). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9): 2026–2032.

[02]    

Antia. B. S., Akpan, E. J. Okon, P. A. and Umoren, I. U. (2006). Nutritive and anti-nutritive Evaluation of Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) leaves. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5: 166-168.

[03]    

Austin, D. F. (1980). Convolvulaceae In: Dassanayake, M. D. and Fosberg, F. R. (eds). A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon, Oxonian Press Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad, India. pp. 288–363.

[04]    

Austin, D. F. and Huaman, Z. (1996). A Synopsis of Ipomoea (Convolculaceae) in the Americas. Taxon, 45: 3-38.

[05]    

Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. (1996). The Nature and Properties of Soils. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, p. 881.

[06]    

Daniel, F. A. (2004). Florida Ethnobotany. Florida: CRC press, p. 365.

[07]    

Daura, M. M., Akintola, F. O. Areola, O. and Faniran, A. (1995). Comparative analysis of nutrient losses on experimental plots under cropping system [in Nigeria, at Ibadan university campus]. Geo-Eco-Trop., 19, 91-104.

[08]    

Fang, R. C. and Staples, G. (1995). Convolvulaceae In: Wu, Z. Y. and Raven P. T. (eds). Flora of China. Science press, Beijing, China, and Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, U. S. A.

[09]    

Hollger, E. Baginska, B. and Cornish, P. S. (1998). Factors influencing soil and nutrient loss in stormwater from a market garden. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australia Agronomy Conference, Wagga Wagga, Australia.

[10]    

Hoyt, P. and Bradfield, R. (1962). “Effect of varying leaf area by defoliation and plant density on dry matter production on corn. Agronomy Journal, 54: 523–525.

[11]    

Jackson, M. I. (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; 498p.

[12]    

Kramprath, E. J. (1967). Conservation of soils and Tissue Testing for accessing the phosphorus status of soils. In: The Role of phosphorus in Agriculture. Khagwnch (ed). American Society of Agronomy, 5, 433–469.

[13]    

Lal, R. (1991). Myths and scientific realities of agroforestry as a strategy for sustainable management for soils in the tropics. Advances in Soil Science, 15, 91–132.

[14]    

Mabberley, D. J. (1997). The Plant Book. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 117.

[15]    

Mbong, E. O. and Ogbemudia, F. O. (2013). Studies on Some Pedological Indices, Nutrient Flux Pattern and Plant Distribution in Metropolitan Dumpsites in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State. Indian J. Pharm. Biol. Res., 1(2): 40–45.

[16]    

McClean T. (1961). Soil Science Made Easy. Washington D. C.: Vinyl Press. pp. 169 – 223.

[17]    

Mondal, A. Kabir, G. Ghosh, G. P. Yasmin, N. Alam, A. M. and Khatun, H. A. (2006). Morphological Variation of Ten Ipomoea Species of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(9): 1714–1719).

[18]    

Morakinyo, J. A., and Ajibade. S. R. (1998). Characterization of the segregants of an improved cowpea line IT84K-124-6. Nigerian J. Sci. 32:27–32.

[19]    

Prakash, C. S. and G. He, (1996). DNA marker-based genetic relatedness in United States sweet potato cultivars. J. American Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:1059–1062.

[20]    

Ramanujam, T. and Indira, P. (1978). Linear measurement and weight methods for estimation of leaf area in cassava and sweet potato. Journal of Root Crops, 4: 47-50.

[21]    

Reed, B. M., Engelmann, F. Dullo, M. E. and Engells, J. M. M. (eds.) (2004). Technical guidelines for the mangagement of field and in vitro collections. IPGRI handbook for genebanks No 7. International Plant Genetic Resource Institute. Rome, Italy.

[22]    

Sabu, R. (2003). Intraspecific Variation of Andrographis paniculata, Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (TBGRI), India.

[23]    

Smith, C. W., Johnston, M. A. and Lorentz, S. (1997). The Effect of Soil Compaction and Soil Physical Properties on the Mechanical Resistance of South African Forestry soils. Geoderma, 78, 93–11.

[24]    

Staples, G. W. and Yang, S. Z. (1998). Convolvulaceae In: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, 2nd. edn, Flora of Taiwan, 4: 341-384.

[25]    

Ubom, R. M. (2004). Biometry. Uyo: Abaam Publishers, pp. 12-58.

[26]    

Verma, S. K. and Verma, M. (2007). A Textbook of Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Sixth Edition, New Delhi: S. Chend and Company Ltd., p. 93-95.

[27]    

Westphal, E. (1992). Ipomoea aquatica Forssk. In: Mannetje, L. and Jones, R. (eds.). Plant resources of South-east Asia. Netherlands: Pudoc Scientific publishers. p. 164–166.

[28]    

Wilson, K. A. (1960). The Genera of Convolvulaceae in the South-eastern United State. J. Arnold Arb. 41: 298-317.

[29]    

Woolfe, J. A. (1992). Sweet potato, An Untapped Food Resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 105.

[30]    

Yada B., Tukamuhabwa, P. Alajo, A. and Mwanga, R. O. M. (2010). Morphological Characterization of Ugandan Sweet potato Germplasm J. Crop Sci. 50:2364–2371.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership