AASCIT - Journal - All Issues

ISSN Print: 2472-9574 ISSN Online: 2472-9590

International Journal of Chemical and Biomedical Science

The Journal

Manuscript Information

Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Electrocautery Blade with Cold Scalpel Blade for Skin Opening During Fixation of Fracture of Forearm Bone with Plate and Screws

International Journal of Chemical and Biomedical Science
Vol.1 , No. 2, Publication Date: May 21, 2015, Page: 52-55

1525 Views Since May 21, 2015, 1106 Downloads Since May 21, 2015

Paper in PDF (927K)

Follow on

Authors

[1]	Shah Kalawar R. P., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[2]	Khanal G. P., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[3]	Chaudhary P., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[4]	Rijal R., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[5]	Maharjan R., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[6]	Paneru S. R., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
[7]	Pokharel B., Department of Orthopaedics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Abstract

Background: Skin incisions have usually been made using a scalpel. Electrocautery, a more recent alternative, is thought to increase the risk of infection, impair healing and decrease cosmesis. Recent studies suggest that electrocautery may offer potential advantages with respect to blood loss, incision time and postoperative pain. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of electrocautery incisions versus conventional scalpel incisions in orthopedic surgeries using internal implants. Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective study in a tertiary care center in the Department of Orthopaedics, BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal. Patients with closed fracture of the forearm bones admitted for surgery from April 2014 to September 2014 was included in the study. Each incision was divided into two halves, proximal half to be opened by steel scalpel blades and the distal half to be opened by an electrocautery blade. Proximal half and distal half of incision were compared on operating day and on days 2, 14 and again on 6 weeks and 3 month. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Forearm skin incisions using electrocautery were significantly quicker than scalpel incisions (p<0.05). Postoperative wound complication rates did not differ significantly between the Scalpel and Electrocautery groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: There is no difference in healing of two halves of skin incision made by electrocautery and scalpel in orthopedic surgeries using internal implants.

Keywords

Skin Incision, Scalpel, Electrocautery

Reference

[01]	Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:41-4. [PUBMED]
[02]	Sheikh B. Safety and efficacy of electrocautery utilization for skin opening in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 2004;18:268-72. [PUBMED]
[03]	Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Antonakakis S, Xynos E, Zoras O. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Am Surg. 2005; Apr;71(4)(71(4)): 326-9.
[04]	Byrne FJ, Kearns SR, Mulhall KJ, McCabe JP, Kaar K, Gilmore M, O'Sullivan M, Curtin W. Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomised prospective trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2007; Jul; 25.
[05]	Shamim M. Diathermy vs scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: Double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. World J Surg 2009;33:1594-9. [PUBMED]
[06]	P.L. Chalya, M.D. Mchembe, J.B. Mabula, J.M. Gilyoma.Diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ecajs/article/viewFile/89927/79380 (accessed 17 January 2015).
[07]	Cushing H. Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors with a preliminary note on a new surgical current generator. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989, 64:47:751-84.
[08]	Leaper DJ. Basic surgical skills and anastomosis. In: Russell RC, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJ. Editors. Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery. 24th ed. London. Arnold; 2004, 95-106.
[09]	Siraj A, Farooq-Dar M, Gilani AB, Raziq S. Elective midline laparotomy: Comparison of diathermy and scalpel incisions. Professional Med J. 2011, 18(1): 106-111
[10]	Kumar V, Tewari M, Shukla HS. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. Indian J Cancer 2011, 48:216- 9
[11]	Lodhi FB, Asrar R, Akram M, Hussain R. Incidence of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence (Midline Vs Paramedian Incision Closed With Vicryl No.1). King Edward med Coll 2001, 7:38-40
[12]	Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 2001, 88:41-4.
[13]	Ly J, Mittal A, Windsor J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision. Br J Surg, 2012, 99: 613–620.
[14]	Soballe PW, Nimbkar NV, Hayward I. Electric cautery lowers the contamination threshold for infection of laparotomies. Am J Surg 1998, 175:263-6
[15]	Groot G, Chappell EW. Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates. Am J Surg 1994, 167:601-603
[16]	Peterson A. The use of electrosurgery in reconstructive and cosmetic maxillofacial surgery. Dental Clin North Am .1982, 20:799-823.
[17]	Tobin HA. Electrosurgical blepheroplasty: A technique that questions conventional concepts of fat compartmentisation. Ann Plastic Surg 1985, 14: 59-63.