ISSN Print: 2381-1277  ISSN Online: 2381-1285
AASCIT Journal of Health  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Acute Pancreatitis: Role of Lipase and LDH at Admission as Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality
AASCIT Journal of Health
Vol.5 , No. 3, Publication Date: Jun. 1, 2018, Page: 65-68
907 Views Since June 1, 2018, 1075 Downloads Since Jun. 1, 2018
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Atif Sharif, Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

[2]    

Tasleem Akhtar, Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

[3]    

Mumtaz Akhtar, Department of Surgery, Al Nafees Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

[4]    

Muhammad Hanif, Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

[5]    

Naeem Zia, Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

 
Abstract
 

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease with multiple scoring systems to predict severity of disease. This observational, prospective study was carried out at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi from June, 2013 to January, 2016. On the basis of Glasgow scoring, Ranson’s scoring and CT scan severity index (CTSI), patients were categorized into mild, moderate and severe form of acute pancreatitis. Other investigations like full blood count, liver and renal function tests, serum amylase, lipase, blood sugar random, fasting lipid profile and serum calcium were done for all the patients as routine. CT severity index was calculated by the radiologist using Balthazar score when Contrast enhanced CT scan abdomen was indicated in certain deteriorating patients. Using a step up approach, surgical intervention was done in those patients whose condition deteriorated despite intensive medical management. In the study, there were 324 patients with mean age of 41.21+/-15.08 years ranging between 14-67 years of age. Overall morbidity development was 54.37% among the patients presenting with acute pancreatitis. 20 patients developed local complications needing necrosectomy and drainage of abcesses and 7 died in the course of illness. ICU admissions were 25% and Overall mortality was 16.04%. Admission value of LDH (p<0.0001), total leucocyte count (p<0.0001) and serum Lipase (p<0.0001) were significantly correlated with development of morbidity and mortality. However Amylase level (p<0.0001), Ranson’s score (p=0.769) and Glasgow scale (p=0.646) did not correlate significantly with mortality and morbidity, concluding that LDH, Lipase and Total leucocyte count can predict outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis supplemented by clinical judgement.


Keywords
 

Acute Pancreatitis, Ranson Score, Glasgow Score, APACHE II, Necrosectomy


Reference
 
[01]    

Mateua A, Ramudoa L, Mansoa, MA, Closab D, Diosa D. Acinar inflammatory response to lipid derivatives generated in necrotic fat during acute pancreatitis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 2014; 1842 (9): 1879-86.

[02]    

Vengadakrishnan K, Koushik AK. A study of the clinical profile of acute pancreatitis and its correlation with severity indices. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015; 9 (4): 410-4.

[03]    

Singh VK, Bollen TL, Wu BU, et al. An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9: 1098.

[04]    

Beger HG, Rau BM. Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 5043.

[05]    

Forsmark CE, Baillie J. AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132: 2022.

[06]    

Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62: 102.

[07]    

Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 1400.

[08]    

Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13: e1.

[09]    

Windsor JA. A better way to predict the outcome in acute pancreatitis? Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1671. [PubMed] Wu BU, Banks PA. Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144: 1272.

[10]    

Chauhan S, Forsmark CE. The difficulty in predicting outcome in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 443.

[11]    

Johnson CD, Abu-Hilal M. Persistent organ failure during the first week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2004; 53: 1340.

[12]    

Robert JH, Frossard JL, Mermillod B, et al. Early prediction of acute pancreatitis: prospective study comparing computed tomography scans, Ranson, Glasgow, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, and various serum markers. World J Surg. 2002; 26: 612.

[13]    

Yadav D, Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS. A critical evaluation of laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 1309.

[14]    

Hofmeyr S, Meyer C, Warren BL. Serum lipase should be the laboratory test of choice for suspected acute pancreatitis. S. Afr. j. surg 2014; 52 (3): 34-8.

[15]    

Wu BU, Bakker OJ, Papachristou GI, et al. Blood urea nitrogen in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis: an international validation study. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 669.

[16]    

Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. High serum creatinine in acute pancreatitis: a marker for pancreatic necrosis? Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1196.

[17]    

Mayumi T, Inui K, Maetani I, et al. Validity of the urinary trypsinogen-2 test in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2012; 41: 869.

[18]    

Huang QL, Qian ZX, Li H. A comparative study of the urinary trypsinogen-2, trypsinogen activation peptide, and the computed tomography severity index as early predictors of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010; 57: 1295.

[19]    

Hartwig W, Maksan SM, Foitzik T, et al. Reduction in mortality with delayed surgical therapy of severe pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6: 481. [PubMed].

[20]    

vanSantvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 1254.

[21]    

Howard TJ, Patel JB, Zyromski N, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality rates in the surgical management of pancreatic necrosis. J GastrointestSurg. 2007; 11: 43.

[22]    

Mortelé KJ, Girshman J, Szejnfeld D, et al. CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: clinical experience and observations in patients with sterile and infected necrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 110. 144: 1272.

[23]    

Freeman ML, Werner J, van Santvoort HC, et al. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Pancreas. 2012; 41: 1176.

[24]    

van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1491.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership